<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellants Misdeclared Goods as &quot;Rejects&quot;; Rule 7 Valuation Upheld as Neither Arbitrary Nor Illegal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71098</link>
    <description>Valuation of goods - Misdeclaration of export goods - the appellants sold the goods of prime quality mis-declaring the same as “rejects” and the same was sold to the related company UIL. It has been found that the UIL sold the goods at a higher rate. Therefore, the valuation ordered to be done under Rule 7 on the basis of the same cannot be said to be arbitrary and/or illegal. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:27:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:27:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellants Misdeclared Goods as &quot;Rejects&quot;; Rule 7 Valuation Upheld as Neither Arbitrary Nor Illegal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71098</link>
      <description>Valuation of goods - Misdeclaration of export goods - the appellants sold the goods of prime quality mis-declaring the same as “rejects” and the same was sold to the related company UIL. It has been found that the UIL sold the goods at a higher rate. Therefore, the valuation ordered to be done under Rule 7 on the basis of the same cannot be said to be arbitrary and/or illegal. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:27:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>