https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440782 Continuation of suspension under Rule 10(i)(a) of the CCS (CCA) Rules was upheld where the competent authority reviewed the matter, recorded reasons, and relied on the gravity of the allegations. The Delhi High Court accepted that Ajay Kumar Choudhary does not impose an absolute bar on extending suspension beyond the initial period, and rejected the argument that fixation of headquarters at another zone by itself negated the need for suspension. Finding no infirmity in the disciplinary authority's order, the Court declined interference under Article 226. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440782 Continuation of suspension under Rule 10(i)(a) of the CCS (CCA) Rules was upheld where the competent authority reviewed the matter, recorded reasons, and relied on the gravity of the allegations. The Delhi High Court accepted that Ajay Kumar Choudhary does not impose an absolute bar on extending suspension beyond the initial period, and rejected the argument that fixation of headquarters at another zone by itself negated the need for suspension. Finding no infirmity in the disciplinary authority's order, the Court declined interference under Article 226. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440782