<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1052 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440779</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, concluding no substantial question of law warranted its admission. The decision was based on the assessment process and treatment of stock differences, with the ITAT&#039;s findings deemed adequate. The PCIT&#039;s call for further verification was rejected, as the existing record sufficiently addressed the stock discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1052 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440779</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, concluding no substantial question of law warranted its admission. The decision was based on the assessment process and treatment of stock differences, with the ITAT&#039;s findings deemed adequate. The PCIT&#039;s call for further verification was rejected, as the existing record sufficiently addressed the stock discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>