<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 391 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33421</link>
    <description>An agreement of sale is not invalid merely because the stamp papers were purchased on different dates or more than six months before execution; under the Indian Stamp Act, old stamp papers may raise suspicion about genuineness and stamping, but not automatic invalidity. A court may compare disputed and admitted thumb impressions under the Evidence Act, but a vague or smudgy impression cannot safely be assessed on casual comparison without careful analysis or expert support. The propounder of the agreement remains bound to prove execution, and surrounding circumstances such as doubtful impressions and weak supporting testimony may defeat a claim for specific performance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 391 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33421</link>
      <description>An agreement of sale is not invalid merely because the stamp papers were purchased on different dates or more than six months before execution; under the Indian Stamp Act, old stamp papers may raise suspicion about genuineness and stamping, but not automatic invalidity. A court may compare disputed and admitted thumb impressions under the Evidence Act, but a vague or smudgy impression cannot safely be assessed on casual comparison without careful analysis or expert support. The propounder of the agreement remains bound to prove execution, and surrounding circumstances such as doubtful impressions and weak supporting testimony may defeat a claim for specific performance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>