<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1385 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308828</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the Appellant&#039;s claims for protection of possession against HDFC Bank based on tenancy rights under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The Court emphasized the importance of registered instruments to support tenancy claims and the need for substantial evidence in cases involving mortgage creation and possession disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1385 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308828</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the Appellant&#039;s claims for protection of possession against HDFC Bank based on tenancy rights under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The Court emphasized the importance of registered instruments to support tenancy claims and the need for substantial evidence in cases involving mortgage creation and possession disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>