<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308831</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs.564,500. It found that the Assessing Officer did not provide a reasonable opportunity for explanation, and the addition of cash deposits was sustained arbitrarily without considering the availability of funds demonstrated in the cash flow statement. The Tribunal concluded that the authorities&#039; proceedings were unjustified, leading to the deletion of the addition and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 08:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308831</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs.564,500. It found that the Assessing Officer did not provide a reasonable opportunity for explanation, and the addition of cash deposits was sustained arbitrarily without considering the availability of funds demonstrated in the cash flow statement. The Tribunal concluded that the authorities&#039; proceedings were unjustified, leading to the deletion of the addition and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>