<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 453 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308815</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified the invocation of Section 73 of the CrPC, 1973, allowing warrants during investigation for non-bailable offences. It overturned the Designated Court&#039;s rejection of non-bailable warrants and proclamations post-cognizance, emphasizing the Court&#039;s power under Section 73. The Court also ruled that remand to police custody under Section 167 after cognizance is possible for further investigation. It highlighted the Magistrate&#039;s role in judicially exercising discretion for warrants and police custody. The appeals were allowed, directing the Designated Court to reconsider applications in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:45:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 453 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308815</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified the invocation of Section 73 of the CrPC, 1973, allowing warrants during investigation for non-bailable offences. It overturned the Designated Court&#039;s rejection of non-bailable warrants and proclamations post-cognizance, emphasizing the Court&#039;s power under Section 73. The Court also ruled that remand to police custody under Section 167 after cognizance is possible for further investigation. It highlighted the Magistrate&#039;s role in judicially exercising discretion for warrants and police custody. The appeals were allowed, directing the Designated Court to reconsider applications in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>