<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1009 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no addition could be made under sections 69A and 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. The appellant adequately explained the cash deposits, demonstrating they were from legitimate business activities. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s submissions on profit margins and business operations, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1009 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that no addition could be made under sections 69A and 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. The appellant adequately explained the cash deposits, demonstrating they were from legitimate business activities. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s submissions on profit margins and business operations, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>