<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1005 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440732</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding tax authorities improperly assessed ownership of goods in transit. The court directed a re-examination of ownership claims, quashed the original order, and emphasized proper procedural assessment of tax liability based on accompanying documentation. The decision mandated a fair review considering applicable tax regulations and ownership verification protocols.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1005 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440732</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding tax authorities improperly assessed ownership of goods in transit. The court directed a re-examination of ownership claims, quashed the original order, and emphasized proper procedural assessment of tax liability based on accompanying documentation. The decision mandated a fair review considering applicable tax regulations and ownership verification protocols.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>