<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 996 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440723</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the deletion of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the assessee&#039;s voluntary disclosure and bona fide reasons for an excess claim did not warrant the penalty. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty and dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 996 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440723</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the deletion of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It found that the assessee&#039;s voluntary disclosure and bona fide reasons for an excess claim did not warrant the penalty. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty and dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>