<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 994 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, overturning the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not adequately verified the details of the transactions, leading to a lack of basis for the deletion. The issue was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration with additional information from the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:14:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 994 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, overturning the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not adequately verified the details of the transactions, leading to a lack of basis for the deletion. The issue was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration with additional information from the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>