<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 974 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440701</link>
    <description>The final assessment order passed pursuant to DRP directions was held to be time-barred because section 144C(13) required it to be made within one month from the end of the month in which the directions were received. As the directions were received on 30.12.2021, the last permissible date was 31.01.2022, but the order was passed on 02.02.2022. The order was therefore beyond the statutory limit, treated as non est, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 974 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440701</link>
      <description>The final assessment order passed pursuant to DRP directions was held to be time-barred because section 144C(13) required it to be made within one month from the end of the month in which the directions were received. As the directions were received on 30.12.2021, the last permissible date was 31.01.2022, but the order was passed on 02.02.2022. The order was therefore beyond the statutory limit, treated as non est, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>