<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 971 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for depreciation on the intangible asset created by the expenditure on the BOT project for the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Tribunal held that the right acquired by the assessee to operate the project facility and collect toll charges qualifies as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the CIT(A) and AO were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 971 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for depreciation on the intangible asset created by the expenditure on the BOT project for the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Tribunal held that the right acquired by the assessee to operate the project facility and collect toll charges qualifies as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the CIT(A) and AO were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>