<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1799 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308803</link>
    <description>Deduction claims and related disallowances were treated largely as fact-dependent matters requiring fresh examination where the record did not adequately address manufacture, asset character, unit-wise expenditure allocation, or depreciation classification. The Tribunal remanded the section 80IC, section 14A, section 115JB, additional depreciation, common expenditure, and UPS depreciation issues for reconsideration. By contrast, the weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) and the leave salary provision disallowance were sustained because the statutory approval and binding precedent governed the outcome. Payments for logistics services to a non-resident were held not disallowable, as the services were rendered outside India and were neither managerial nor technical, and the forward contract loss was accepted as allowable business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1799 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308803</link>
      <description>Deduction claims and related disallowances were treated largely as fact-dependent matters requiring fresh examination where the record did not adequately address manufacture, asset character, unit-wise expenditure allocation, or depreciation classification. The Tribunal remanded the section 80IC, section 14A, section 115JB, additional depreciation, common expenditure, and UPS depreciation issues for reconsideration. By contrast, the weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) and the leave salary provision disallowance were sustained because the statutory approval and binding precedent governed the outcome. Payments for logistics services to a non-resident were held not disallowable, as the services were rendered outside India and were neither managerial nor technical, and the forward contract loss was accepted as allowable business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>