<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1862 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the Rs. 47,00,000/- addition under Section 69. The Tribunal found that the addition was based on speculative and baseless grounds without concrete evidence linking the impounded document&#039;s notings to the flat purchase. The interest levied under Sections 234A/B/C was to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1862 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the Rs. 47,00,000/- addition under Section 69. The Tribunal found that the addition was based on speculative and baseless grounds without concrete evidence linking the impounded document&#039;s notings to the flat purchase. The interest levied under Sections 234A/B/C was to be recomputed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>