<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1704 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the Assessee on assets of closed units. The dispute centered on whether the units were permanently closed or temporarily suspended, requiring a detailed examination of the status of non-operative units and the assets claimed for depreciation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for complete details and evidence from the Assessee to support their contentions, considering legal precedents and the requirement for assets to be put to use for claiming depreciation. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive reevaluation of the depreciation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1704 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the Assessee on assets of closed units. The dispute centered on whether the units were permanently closed or temporarily suspended, requiring a detailed examination of the status of non-operative units and the assets claimed for depreciation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for complete details and evidence from the Assessee to support their contentions, considering legal precedents and the requirement for assets to be put to use for claiming depreciation. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive reevaluation of the depreciation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>