https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308808 The writ court held that prolonged suspension of an employee under criminal investigation, lasting over six years, was unjustified. It emphasized that suspension should not exceed three months without a reasoned order, as per precedent. The court criticized the payment of subsistence allowance without work, directing the consideration of revocation of suspension and assignment to a non-sensitive post. Additionally, it ordered the expedited completion of the criminal trial. The appellate court upheld these decisions, rejecting the State's appeal against revocation of suspension and emphasizing the need to avoid unnecessary financial burden on the public exchequer. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308808 The writ court held that prolonged suspension of an employee under criminal investigation, lasting over six years, was unjustified. It emphasized that suspension should not exceed three months without a reasoned order, as per precedent. The court criticized the payment of subsistence allowance without work, directing the consideration of revocation of suspension and assignment to a non-sensitive post. Additionally, it ordered the expedited completion of the criminal trial. The appellate court upheld these decisions, rejecting the State's appeal against revocation of suspension and emphasizing the need to avoid unnecessary financial burden on the public exchequer. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308808