https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308807 Writ petitions challenging anti-dumping final findings were held premature because the findings were only recommendations and had not yet become operative through a Central Government notification. The court noted that the statutory scheme provided an appellate remedy after the recommendation matured into an enforceable order, and that the disputes raised factual questions on like article, non-injurious price, dumping margin, confidentiality, and landed value that were intertwined with the merits of the investigation. In these circumstances, the existence of the specialised remedy weighed against immediate writ intervention, and the petitions were not entertained on merits at that stage. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308807 Writ petitions challenging anti-dumping final findings were held premature because the findings were only recommendations and had not yet become operative through a Central Government notification. The court noted that the statutory scheme provided an appellate remedy after the recommendation matured into an enforceable order, and that the disputes raised factual questions on like article, non-injurious price, dumping margin, confidentiality, and landed value that were intertwined with the merits of the investigation. In these circumstances, the existence of the specialised remedy weighed against immediate writ intervention, and the petitions were not entertained on merits at that stage. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308807