https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308805 The court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's order quashing the respondent's suspension that exceeded 90 days without issuing a charge sheet. It emphasized that suspension could be justified if reasons were recorded and communicated, highlighting that the Supreme Court's decision did not automatically nullify suspensions extended beyond 90 days without a charge sheet. The respondent's suspension could continue if extended in conformity with Rule 10(6) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, provided justifiable reasons were communicated, allowing him to challenge the extension on legal grounds. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308805 The court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's order quashing the respondent's suspension that exceeded 90 days without issuing a charge sheet. It emphasized that suspension could be justified if reasons were recorded and communicated, highlighting that the Supreme Court's decision did not automatically nullify suspensions extended beyond 90 days without a charge sheet. The respondent's suspension could continue if extended in conformity with Rule 10(6) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, provided justifiable reasons were communicated, allowing him to challenge the extension on legal grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308805