<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2120 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308811</link>
    <description>Rule 8(4) of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 requires the disciplinary authority itself to draw up, or cause to be drawn up, the charge memo; prior approval only for initiation of proceedings was held insufficient, so the charge memo was invalid and the High Court&#039;s quashing of the disciplinary proceedings was upheld. The officer&#039;s prolonged suspension was also unjustified because it continued for more than six years without material showing tampering with evidence or interference with the trial; mere apprehension was not enough, so the direction to reinstate the officer was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2120 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308811</link>
      <description>Rule 8(4) of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 requires the disciplinary authority itself to draw up, or cause to be drawn up, the charge memo; prior approval only for initiation of proceedings was held insufficient, so the charge memo was invalid and the High Court&#039;s quashing of the disciplinary proceedings was upheld. The officer&#039;s prolonged suspension was also unjustified because it continued for more than six years without material showing tampering with evidence or interference with the trial; mere apprehension was not enough, so the direction to reinstate the officer was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>