<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308795</link>
    <description>Continued suspension pending criminal trial was found unnecessary where the employee had remained under suspension for nearly five years, the investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and the trial had made little progress. The absence of the employee&#039;s name in the FIR and the lack of any specific allegation against him further supported revocation. Applying Rule 3(e)(5) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, the Court accepted that suspension could be revoked and the employee accommodated in a non-sensitive posting; the quashing of the suspension was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:52:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308795</link>
      <description>Continued suspension pending criminal trial was found unnecessary where the employee had remained under suspension for nearly five years, the investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and the trial had made little progress. The absence of the employee&#039;s name in the FIR and the lack of any specific allegation against him further supported revocation. Applying Rule 3(e)(5) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, the Court accepted that suspension could be revoked and the employee accommodated in a non-sensitive posting; the quashing of the suspension was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>