<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308795</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the learned single Judge, dismissing the appeal without costs and closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition. The Court determined that revocation of suspension was appropriate pending trial, suggesting reassignment to a non-sensitive post to utilize the salary paid as subsistence allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:52:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308795</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the learned single Judge, dismissing the appeal without costs and closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition. The Court determined that revocation of suspension was appropriate pending trial, suggesting reassignment to a non-sensitive post to utilize the salary paid as subsistence allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>