<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 536 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308794</link>
    <description>Records a reported appeal in a central excise dispute between Glaxo India Ltd and the tax collector, where the appellate challenge was dismissed and the impugned decision thereby left undisturbed; the entry provides the procedural outcome (appeal dismissed) and citation details but contains no substantive reasoning or articulated legal principles in the text supplied, therefore no operative legal doctrine or statutory interpretation can be extracted from this document alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 536 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308794</link>
      <description>Records a reported appeal in a central excise dispute between Glaxo India Ltd and the tax collector, where the appellate challenge was dismissed and the impugned decision thereby left undisturbed; the entry provides the procedural outcome (appeal dismissed) and citation details but contains no substantive reasoning or articulated legal principles in the text supplied, therefore no operative legal doctrine or statutory interpretation can be extracted from this document alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>