<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Department cannot invoke extended period without proving suppression of fact</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11641</link>
    <description>Suppression of facts requires deliberate, willful conduct to justify invoking the extended period of limitation; mere omissions are insufficient. The revenue must prove deliberate concealment or intent to evade tax before extended limitation applies. A conclusory finding of suppression without factual examination cannot sustain an extended limitation invocation in BAS-related service tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:05:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:05:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Department cannot invoke extended period without proving suppression of fact</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11641</link>
      <description>Suppression of facts requires deliberate, willful conduct to justify invoking the extended period of limitation; mere omissions are insufficient. The revenue must prove deliberate concealment or intent to evade tax before extended limitation applies. A conclusory finding of suppression without factual examination cannot sustain an extended limitation invocation in BAS-related service tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:05:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>