https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33399 The High Court upheld the validity of the revisional authority's order passed within the statutory period, emphasizing the importance of providing a personal hearing to concerned parties. It rejected the argument that the remand order would extend the limitation period for passing orders, clarifying that once the initial order is issued within the prescribed timeframe, subsequent actions by the revisional authority do not affect the deadline. The Court dismissed the appeals and affirmed compliance with Section 84(5) of the Finance Act. en-us Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33399 The High Court upheld the validity of the revisional authority's order passed within the statutory period, emphasizing the importance of providing a personal hearing to concerned parties. It rejected the argument that the remand order would extend the limitation period for passing orders, clarifying that once the initial order is issued within the prescribed timeframe, subsequent actions by the revisional authority do not affect the deadline. The Court dismissed the appeals and affirmed compliance with Section 84(5) of the Finance Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33399