<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 131 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33397</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the agreements were solely for the sale of technical know-how and not for consulting engineer services subject to service tax. The tribunal found that the agreements did not involve consultancy and that post-know-how transfer activities did not constitute technical advice. The decision was made on 6-1-2009 by the tribunal members.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 131 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33397</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the agreements were solely for the sale of technical know-how and not for consulting engineer services subject to service tax. The tribunal found that the agreements did not involve consultancy and that post-know-how transfer activities did not constitute technical advice. The decision was made on 6-1-2009 by the tribunal members.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>