<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 390 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33393</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the COD applications and scheduled the stay petitions due to the delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to circumstances beyond the appellant&#039;s control, including the factory seal by Customs and CBI, director&#039;s detention, and unavailability of essential documents. The Tribunal found these factors constituted sufficient cause for the delay, emphasizing the importance of considering such circumstances in determining the sufficiency of cause for late submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 390 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33393</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the COD applications and scheduled the stay petitions due to the delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to circumstances beyond the appellant&#039;s control, including the factory seal by Customs and CBI, director&#039;s detention, and unavailability of essential documents. The Tribunal found these factors constituted sufficient cause for the delay, emphasizing the importance of considering such circumstances in determining the sufficiency of cause for late submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>