<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 878 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440605</link>
    <description>The revision petition against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed as the matter had been compromised by the parties. The accused was acquitted upon payment of a compounding fee. The appellate court reduced the imprisonment and compensation amount. The bail bonds were discharged, and the trial court record was to be returned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2023 20:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 878 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440605</link>
      <description>The revision petition against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed as the matter had been compromised by the parties. The accused was acquitted upon payment of a compounding fee. The appellate court reduced the imprisonment and compensation amount. The bail bonds were discharged, and the trial court record was to be returned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>