<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 865 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440592</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, determining that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was unjustified due to the lack of an allegation that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the additions made by the AO to the taxable income were also invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 865 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440592</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, determining that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was unjustified due to the lack of an allegation that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the additions made by the AO to the taxable income were also invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>