<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 864 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440591</link>
    <description>Penalty under provisions for non filing of statutory returns was imposed despite the taxpayer furnishing explanations; the authorities found no mens rea element required by the statutory language and rejected the taxpayer&#039;s claim of reasonable cause for a 525 day delay, treating the stated reasons as insufficient, and accordingly sustained penalty liability. The respondents specifically considered the contention under the reasonable cause standard and declined relief; however, the imposed rate was reduced in practice from the maximum daily amount to a lower per day penalty. The decision also records that no remedy to a tribunal lies from orders under the penalty provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 864 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440591</link>
      <description>Penalty under provisions for non filing of statutory returns was imposed despite the taxpayer furnishing explanations; the authorities found no mens rea element required by the statutory language and rejected the taxpayer&#039;s claim of reasonable cause for a 525 day delay, treating the stated reasons as insufficient, and accordingly sustained penalty liability. The respondents specifically considered the contention under the reasonable cause standard and declined relief; however, the imposed rate was reduced in practice from the maximum daily amount to a lower per day penalty. The decision also records that no remedy to a tribunal lies from orders under the penalty provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>