<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440589</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, declaring them invalid. It held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by attempting to reopen the Petitioner&#039;s assessment based on a subsequent AAR ruling in another case. The original AAR ruling remained binding, with no change in law or facts justifying reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440589</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, declaring them invalid. It held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by attempting to reopen the Petitioner&#039;s assessment based on a subsequent AAR ruling in another case. The original AAR ruling remained binding, with no change in law or facts justifying reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>