<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440582</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that no disallowance was warranted under section 14A as the appellant&#039;s own funds exceeded the investments for earning exempt income. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440582</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that no disallowance was warranted under section 14A as the appellant&#039;s own funds exceeded the investments for earning exempt income. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>