<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 841 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs.5,00,000 under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The confiscation of red sanders valued at Rs.33,90,000 was upheld, with other goods allowed redemption upon payment of a fine. The appellant&#039;s lack of knowledge regarding the prohibited nature of the goods was considered, leading to the finding that the penalty initially imposed was disproportionate and excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:25:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 841 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs.5,00,000 under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The confiscation of red sanders valued at Rs.33,90,000 was upheld, with other goods allowed redemption upon payment of a fine. The appellant&#039;s lack of knowledge regarding the prohibited nature of the goods was considered, leading to the finding that the penalty initially imposed was disproportionate and excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>