<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 838 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440565</link>
    <description>The tariff classification dispute over Samsung Galaxy Tab GT-P1000 was resolved in favour of classification as tablet computers under CTH 84713090 rather than mobile phones under CTH 85171290. The Tribunal noted that the product description on the packages and the nature of the goods supported the department&#039;s view, and it recorded the respondent&#039;s later acceptance of classification under CTH 84713090. The department&#039;s appeal on classification therefore succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 838 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440565</link>
      <description>The tariff classification dispute over Samsung Galaxy Tab GT-P1000 was resolved in favour of classification as tablet computers under CTH 84713090 rather than mobile phones under CTH 85171290. The Tribunal noted that the product description on the packages and the nature of the goods supported the department&#039;s view, and it recorded the respondent&#039;s later acceptance of classification under CTH 84713090. The department&#039;s appeal on classification therefore succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>