https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440560 The Tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal due to a delay of 290 days in filing, ruling it exceeded the permissible time limit under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant's argument of not being informed promptly about the approval of the resolution plan was not accepted. The appeal was deemed not maintainable without a certified copy of the impugned order, as per Rule 22 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal did not entertain the Condonation Delay Application due to the significant delay, aligning with previous decisions and statutory provisions. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:25:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440560 The Tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal due to a delay of 290 days in filing, ruling it exceeded the permissible time limit under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant's argument of not being informed promptly about the approval of the resolution plan was not accepted. The appeal was deemed not maintainable without a certified copy of the impugned order, as per Rule 22 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal did not entertain the Condonation Delay Application due to the significant delay, aligning with previous decisions and statutory provisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440560