<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for exemption under Notification 6/2006-CE and 12/2012-CE as the cleared parts constituted a complete boiler. The demand for the normal period was upheld, and the extended period was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of suppression of facts. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, while those by the department were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for exemption under Notification 6/2006-CE and 12/2012-CE as the cleared parts constituted a complete boiler. The demand for the normal period was upheld, and the extended period was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of suppression of facts. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, while those by the department were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>