<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1479 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308770</link>
    <description>An engagement partner was found to have committed professional misconduct by issuing an unmodified audit opinion despite false reporting and material omissions in the financial statements. The record showed failure to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, inadequate audit documentation, non-evaluation of going concern and fraud risks, and non-compliance with auditing standards, accounting standards, and statutory reporting requirements, including disclosures on related party transactions and presentation requirements. The authority treated the repeated and serious audit failures as warranting deterrent action and imposed monetary penalty and debarment. The stated principle is that an auditor who certifies financial statements without proper evidence, proper disclosure, and compliance with applicable standards commits professional misconduct attracting penal consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1479 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308770</link>
      <description>An engagement partner was found to have committed professional misconduct by issuing an unmodified audit opinion despite false reporting and material omissions in the financial statements. The record showed failure to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, inadequate audit documentation, non-evaluation of going concern and fraud risks, and non-compliance with auditing standards, accounting standards, and statutory reporting requirements, including disclosures on related party transactions and presentation requirements. The authority treated the repeated and serious audit failures as warranting deterrent action and imposed monetary penalty and debarment. The stated principle is that an auditor who certifies financial statements without proper evidence, proper disclosure, and compliance with applicable standards commits professional misconduct attracting penal consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>