<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the revision order passed by the CIT(Exemption) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) as required by CBDT Circular No. 19 of 2019. The order was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, deeming the revision order to have never been issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the revision order passed by the CIT(Exemption) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) as required by CBDT Circular No. 19 of 2019. The order was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, deeming the revision order to have never been issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>