https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440545 The court decided to keep the disputed orders in abeyance until the scheduled date for the appeal's consideration by the NCLAT on 03.07.2023. The petitioners were granted the liberty to seek necessary orders from the NCLAT in the interim. The court emphasized that its decision was solely based on the appeal's scheduled hearing date and did not delve into the case's merits. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:34:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440545 The court decided to keep the disputed orders in abeyance until the scheduled date for the appeal's consideration by the NCLAT on 03.07.2023. The petitioners were granted the liberty to seek necessary orders from the NCLAT in the interim. The court emphasized that its decision was solely based on the appeal's scheduled hearing date and did not delve into the case's merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440545