<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 795 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 unjustifiable as the appellant&#039;s explanations were not considered. The penalty of Rs. 10,000 was deemed unsustainable, leading to its deletion by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was granted in favor of the assessee, overturning the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 795 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 unjustifiable as the appellant&#039;s explanations were not considered. The penalty of Rs. 10,000 was deemed unsustainable, leading to its deletion by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was granted in favor of the assessee, overturning the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>