https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440509 The court held that the Customs Authorities lacked the legal basis to seize the imported goods under Bill of Lading EXSH2310608, as there was no court order supporting the trademark claim by respondent no. 8. The seizure was deemed "ex-facie illegal" due to non-compliance with the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007. Consequently, the court ordered the release of the goods and allowed the petition, leaving all issues open for resolution in the ongoing civil suits. The petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440509 The court held that the Customs Authorities lacked the legal basis to seize the imported goods under Bill of Lading EXSH2310608, as there was no court order supporting the trademark claim by respondent no. 8. The seizure was deemed "ex-facie illegal" due to non-compliance with the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007. Consequently, the court ordered the release of the goods and allowed the petition, leaving all issues open for resolution in the ongoing civil suits. The petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440509