<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 762 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440489</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal held that the demand of excise duty on compensation received due to cancellation of orders by a corporation was barred by limitation. The Appellant had informed the department about the cancellations in a timely manner, and no suppression of information occurred. The Tribunal found that the demands were time-barred as all relevant information was provided in 2003, rendering the extended period of limitation invoked for the demand of excise duty unsustainable. Consequently, the demand of excise duty on compensation received was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 762 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440489</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal held that the demand of excise duty on compensation received due to cancellation of orders by a corporation was barred by limitation. The Appellant had informed the department about the cancellations in a timely manner, and no suppression of information occurred. The Tribunal found that the demands were time-barred as all relevant information was provided in 2003, rendering the extended period of limitation invoked for the demand of excise duty unsustainable. Consequently, the demand of excise duty on compensation received was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>