https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308764 Natural justice ordinarily requires notice and hearing before adverse administrative action, but that requirement may be limited where the State shows a genuine national security concern. In such cases, the affected person cannot insist on full disclosure of sensitive reasons or source material, and the court may inspect the record only to test whether the security claim is bona fide. The executive remains the primary judge of national security risk, and judicial interference is restrained where disclosure would compromise security. The text states that the exception to natural justice on national security grounds was upheld and that the challenge to withdrawal of security clearance did not warrant interference on merits. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2025 17:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308764 Natural justice ordinarily requires notice and hearing before adverse administrative action, but that requirement may be limited where the State shows a genuine national security concern. In such cases, the affected person cannot insist on full disclosure of sensitive reasons or source material, and the court may inspect the record only to test whether the security claim is bona fide. The executive remains the primary judge of national security risk, and judicial interference is restrained where disclosure would compromise security. The text states that the exception to natural justice on national security grounds was upheld and that the challenge to withdrawal of security clearance did not warrant interference on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308764