<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 754 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440481</link>
    <description>Services supplied under the Market led Fee-based Services Scheme were held to qualify for exemption under entry 69 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because the provider was an approved training partner of NSDC and the programme was a scheme implemented by NSDC. On that basis, the services fell within the notified exempt category and no GST was payable. The ruling therefore treated the services as exempt from GST under the relevant exemption entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 754 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440481</link>
      <description>Services supplied under the Market led Fee-based Services Scheme were held to qualify for exemption under entry 69 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because the provider was an approved training partner of NSDC and the programme was a scheme implemented by NSDC. On that basis, the services fell within the notified exempt category and no GST was payable. The ruling therefore treated the services as exempt from GST under the relevant exemption entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>