<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 75 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33364</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed Ext.P7 order, and directed the 1st respondent to provide an unconditional waiver of the pre-deposit amount, enabling the appeal to proceed without any deposit requirement. The Court emphasized the established legal precedent favoring the petitioner and the need to grant a complete waiver of the disputed duty amount based on the strong prima facie case presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 75 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33364</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed Ext.P7 order, and directed the 1st respondent to provide an unconditional waiver of the pre-deposit amount, enabling the appeal to proceed without any deposit requirement. The Court emphasized the established legal precedent favoring the petitioner and the need to grant a complete waiver of the disputed duty amount based on the strong prima facie case presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>