<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 73 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33361</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the addition of Rs.3.17 crores as undisclosed income in the appellant&#039;s hands, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the method of accounting and the validity of block assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s findings, including the appellant&#039;s involvement in crediting the amount to his account and lack of evidence supporting a change in accounting method, supported the taxation of undisclosed income. The Court emphasized the appellant&#039;s prior agreement on the treatment of the amount as undisclosed income and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the undisclosed income was rightly taxed during the block period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 73 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33361</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the addition of Rs.3.17 crores as undisclosed income in the appellant&#039;s hands, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the method of accounting and the validity of block assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s findings, including the appellant&#039;s involvement in crediting the amount to his account and lack of evidence supporting a change in accounting method, supported the taxation of undisclosed income. The Court emphasized the appellant&#039;s prior agreement on the treatment of the amount as undisclosed income and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the undisclosed income was rightly taxed during the block period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>