<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 713 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest on the differential duty was not payable as there was no short payment of duty and the transaction was revenue neutral. The Appellant correctly paid duty based on prescribed methods, and the situation was deemed revenue neutral. The Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order, ruling in favor of the Appellant on 17.07.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 713 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest on the differential duty was not payable as there was no short payment of duty and the transaction was revenue neutral. The Appellant correctly paid duty based on prescribed methods, and the situation was deemed revenue neutral. The Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order, ruling in favor of the Appellant on 17.07.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>