<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Promissory Note Validity Affirmed: Different Ink for Creditor&#039;s Name and Date Isn&#039;t Material Alteration Without Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70973</link>
    <description>Validity of promissory notes - promissory notes are executed for a valid consideration or not - merely, because a different ink is used in respect of the name of the creditor and date of the instruments, we cannot come to a conclusion that the Negotiable Instrument is vitiated by material alteration in the absence of any plea or independent evidence in support of the same. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:59:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:59:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Promissory Note Validity Affirmed: Different Ink for Creditor&#039;s Name and Date Isn&#039;t Material Alteration Without Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70973</link>
      <description>Validity of promissory notes - promissory notes are executed for a valid consideration or not - merely, because a different ink is used in respect of the name of the creditor and date of the instruments, we cannot come to a conclusion that the Negotiable Instrument is vitiated by material alteration in the absence of any plea or independent evidence in support of the same. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:59:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>