<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1741 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of assessment orders under section 153A, dismissed the disallowance under section 14A, deleted additions of undisclosed income based on seized documents due to lack of evidence, and upheld the deduction under section 80IA(4) for the &quot;Sai Trinity&quot; project. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained cash seized during the search, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the source of the cash.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:46:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1741 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of assessment orders under section 153A, dismissed the disallowance under section 14A, deleted additions of undisclosed income based on seized documents due to lack of evidence, and upheld the deduction under section 80IA(4) for the &quot;Sai Trinity&quot; project. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained cash seized during the search, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the source of the cash.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>