<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1658 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer/TPO to rework the Arm&#039;s Length Price of international transactions based on the provided directions. The judgment emphasized considering export incentives and foreign exchange gains as operational income and excluding functionally dissimilar companies from comparables in Transfer Pricing analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:46:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1658 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer/TPO to rework the Arm&#039;s Length Price of international transactions based on the provided directions. The judgment emphasized considering export incentives and foreign exchange gains as operational income and excluding functionally dissimilar companies from comparables in Transfer Pricing analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>