https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308754 An arbitration clause confined to a Memorandum of Understanding did not survive execution of a later Deed of Cancellation that expressly cancelled the MoU, limited the parties' remaining claims to what the deed provided, and contained no arbitration clause. The later deed was treated as the fresh governing agreement, so the dispute was held to arise under the cancellation deed rather than the cancelled MoU. On that basis, Section 8 reference to arbitration was refused because the earlier arbitration clause no longer applied. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:46:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308754 An arbitration clause confined to a Memorandum of Understanding did not survive execution of a later Deed of Cancellation that expressly cancelled the MoU, limited the parties' remaining claims to what the deed provided, and contained no arbitration clause. The later deed was treated as the fresh governing agreement, so the dispute was held to arise under the cancellation deed rather than the cancelled MoU. On that basis, Section 8 reference to arbitration was refused because the earlier arbitration clause no longer applied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308754